|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: .
Posts: 8,198
|
which plane is best for 3d 85-100 cc
and if you pick other tell which plane you picked |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
|
The QQ 101 looks like an awesome flier, but I chose the AW 104" 260. It can be built light and can easily CG with an 85 if that is the engine you choose. I Have had the AW 260 with a BME 110, a big electric, and now a new 260 with a DA-100. It came out very noseheavy with the batts in the stock location, so noseheavy in fact that I ended up with the batts all the way in the tail! This is actually a good thing because that means that it will be easier to balance with an 85, and be lighter!!! I did some work to my 260, and added a full carbon suit, and ended up at 25.7 pounds. That means I could have potentially finished at 24.5 pounds with an 85!
I still recommend a twin, though, as they are smoother running engines so the airframe doesn't wear out so fast.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
|
ONCE AGAIN, A PLANE THAT ISN'T EVEN AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC IS WINNING AT THE POLLS!!! THIS EXPLAINS HOW OBAMA WON!!!
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 621
|
Come on BW, don't you know that the grass is always greener? The one you don't have and can not afford is always better that the one you do have that you could afford? Isn't it easier to afford a 5000 sq ft house than a 1600 sq ft'er?
ps I am right there with you....I love my 260, I am curious about the 300, but it would take quite an aircraft to pull me away from my AW 260... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
|
Agreed. Whatever is the latest is always the greatest in the R/C world, it seems. I have seen the 300 close up. I have seen the flying video. And that is about as much experience as anyone can possibly have with that 300. Unless the two people that voted for the 300 so far are Mark Dennis and Rocco Mariani, then the votes are about as useless as tits on a bull.
I am sure the 300 will be nice, but only time will tell - it will be heavier than the 260 by a pound or so - that much I know, and that's enough for me to lean toward the 260.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 621
|
BW, what are the odds that things have changed on the 260 since you bought yours and I won mine last year during the summer?
The reason I ask is yours seems to have a weight problem ( placement ). I am not into really wild 3d at the moment, but my balance with a DA-100 is almost perfect. The batteries are 2 in the back bay under the hatch and one for the ignition in the middle. I have 2 7955s in a pull pull setup. Flies better than any airplane I have ever owned.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: .
Posts: 8,198
|
[quote=Kevin B;639545]BW, what are the odds that things have changed on the 260 since you bought yours and I won mine last year during the summer?
you won yours |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 621
|
Yeah I got lucky. At our fly in we raffled an AW 260 and I was very lucky to win. I looked at buying one before I bought my WH 300. It was a little more than the WH and the shipping compounded the issue. Cheaper from Dallas area than from Denver.
You can not go wrong with either plane. Its hard to put into words why I think the AW flies better than the WH. They are equipped almost identically. Both have DA-100, both have 2 rx packs and one ignition pack. The AW has 7955s and thew WH has 5955s. THe WH has a JR8711 and the AW has 2 7955s on the rudder. The AW has a PE Sport and the WH has an EQ10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,323
|
Ya know, I kinda look at it this way. The plane that responds the best to my commands and abilities, does all that I ask of it without giving me problems, weighs in light, and is affordable, is the one that hits the top of my list. Unfortunately it's not on the hit list above.
Wild Hare 35% Edge 540. Don't let a price tag a bunch lower than all the others fool you. It's a superb plane. If you just gotta have a little more precision look at their new 35% 260. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Crashen em and Bashen em
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Trying to fly this dang yak
Posts: 4,181
|
Id go with either the new H9 Sukhoi or the EF 110" yak
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
RUTNBUC
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McClellanville South Carolina
Age: 48
Posts: 1,748
|
I,d say go to valleyrc.com and look at the TT TOC 35% yak or 260 with a DL 100 combo deal. TT TOC planes are lite, fly great, 5 star workmanship and the cost is icing on the cake. The DL is alot of engine for the money! Check it out. www.carolinaskydancers.com RutnBuc PS The SD models are now TT Or Thunder Tiger Which is imported by Ace Hobbies.
Last edited by wylieruneyjr; 12-14-2008 at 05:22 PM. Reason: explain |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Mother Huckin'
![]() |
__________________
Pilot RC Aztech Aero/Secraft/EG Aircraft B&E Graphics, Jersey Modeler, TailDragger RC |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#13 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Olney, IL
Posts: 364
|
Your poll is leaving out two of the best 100cc planes out there, the Extreme Flight 110" Yak, and the Hanger 9 100cc extra 260.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: .
Posts: 8,198
|
yeah what do all you of you think of them the H9 260 and EF 110 YAK
![]() OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Olney, IL
Posts: 364
|
I dont mean to hijack this poll, so no offense, I just think these are two top level aircraft that have proven there self and are definately worth a look if you are trying to decide on one.
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pacific Planes. | fun_fly_3d | Manufacturer's Announcements | 99 | 07-28-2008 09:56 AM |
| RCGF 100cc Rear Induction Twin | Tired Old Man | Gas Engines | 17 | 03-31-2008 08:52 PM |
| FlyingGiants Keyboard Deathmatch!! | madmax | General Discussion | 282 | 11-22-2007 09:01 AM |
| 100cc Experiment | DORADO | Airframes and Kits | 21 | 06-22-2006 12:23 PM |
| 100cc Engine - Brands vs Cost | cyberwarrior101 | Gas Engines | 17 | 02-23-2006 06:22 PM |