how many giants are armed??

[Mithrandir]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Greyhoundman
	HMMM just reloaded 400 rounds of 45 and a couple hundred rounds of 357.....think I may go shooting tomorrow.

I am thinking about getting into reloading again... I had a progressive RCBS I think.. 20 years ago...

What is a good progressive Reloader for 45 and 44???

[Mithrandir]

	Quote: Originally Posted by smokin
	hey mith... you're not gonna make the cross country trip with bender to the fx3d are ya??? it would be fun.....

Naw... my wife is pregnant, I am out of vacation time and I am gonna try to buy a house this year..... I think I will mostly fly weekends local!

[nesikachad]

There's armed. . .

. . .and then there's armed.

[MadMonkey]

	Quote: Originally Posted by flyin4fun
	Maybe, just maybe , the second amendment was put in place for american citizens to overthrow a corrupt US government. So, what would it take, 100000, 500000, 1000000, even if you took half of the us population, and they had weapons, and ammo, that they used for hunting, target, skeet, whatever......you cannot go up against stealth fighters and bombers, laser guided missles, warships, nuclear subs, etc,etc,etc, would never happen in this day and age. So, with that being said, what is the second amendment good for in 2009.

It's called guerilla warfare.

How do you think Afghanistan held off the Russians?

How do you think Iraqi insurgents are doing so well against the USA (I really hate it, but it's true)?

The reason guerilla fighters do so well against highly advanced weaponry is because they are so simple. They don't have tanks or other easy-to-locate war machines. What good are air-superiority fighters if they don't have anything to fight? What good are massively expensive cruise missiles and smart bombs if you're fighting a couple of men at a time? There are huge advantages when fighting with a small army that is quick to mobilize and move, with no set headquarters or major encampments.

Simple small arms and explosives can take out more than you think. And believe me... there are hundreds of thousands of civilians who are willing to fight for their freedom. Not as many as I would like, and definitely not all of the ones who say they will, but there are many.

Plus, there are thousands of civilians who can outfight soldiers.

And along those lines, there are thousands of soldiers who would refuse side with the government in a case like this.

Just because the Joint Chiefs order a strike on militia doesn't mean those they order will immediately take their side without question

[flynbye]

	Quote: Originally Posted by nesikachad
	There's armed. . . . . .and then there's armed.

i like how you just slide the plane in there nice touch

[airborneSGT]

Holy crap thats a lot of 240B's!! I would love to have that collection.

[airborneSGT]

One last post before I go to work. One very cool system:

http://www.samson-mfg.com/mm5/mercha...e=SIG_556_Rail

Anyone have one of these?

[nesikachad]

Personal stash. . .

[TheTank]

Sweet rifle Chad! 700 action?



Others... As for this thread. Lets reel it in and talk about the topic heading of the thread. As discussed many times before, politics don't have a place here. Any future political ramblings are going to be nuked. If you want to discuss the topic of the thread (weapons), please go right ahead. Thanks for understanding!

[Craven]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Judge
	Why? Did it do something wrong?

Oh....now you're a funny man.....

[Greyhoundman]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Mithrandir
	I am thinking about getting into reloading again... I had a progressive RCBS I think.. 20 years ago... What is a good progressive Reloader for 45 and 44???

I use a Dillion RL 550 B It is a very easy to use press and once you get going you can pump out the rounds pretty quick. I swapped out the tool head from .45 to .357 last night and loaded the first set of 100 in about 20 minutes.

[selleri]

I had a Remington 870 and Brno .22 a few years back, sold them part way through uni. for some modelling cash

Who knows, maybe one of those days...

[3D1]

	Quote: Originally Posted by TheTank
	Sweet rifle Chad! 700 action? Others... As for this thread. Lets reel it in and talk about the topic heading of the thread. As discussed many times before, politics don't have a place here. Any future political ramblings are going to be nuked. If you want to discuss the topic of the thread (weapons), please go right ahead. Thanks for understanding!

Party Pooper. J/K

[wylieruneyjr]

Okay I got so mad reading Flyin4funs post on page 19 and 20 I skipped a bunch of pages to post this. YOU GOT IT ALL WRONG. WE DON<T NEED GUN OWNERS LIKE YOU! I DO SEE YOUR POINT ,BUT ITS FLAWED BADLY. IF YOU SAY ITS OKAY TO BAN A CERTAIN TYPE OF WEAPON, YOU SIR ARE NOT A GUN SUPPORTER! The gov wants your pistol, always has, always will. Cause its easy to conceal. They know there will be civil unrest if the try and take daddy,s 357 magnum. So they and YOU YES YOU say lets take the most menacing weapon and get a bunch of dumb-ass to agree that know one person should own a mechine-gun or sniper rifle. And you fall for this crap. Next thing you know certain states say hey you cannot own a gun that holds more than ten bullets, or with a pistol stock etc... hey you can not own carry or poccess a PISTOL -- YOU GOT IT-- NO GUN FOR YOU --- YOU MUST SUPPORT ALL GUNS -- ALL OF THEM--- NEXT TO GO IS YOUR SEMI AUTOMATIC SHOTGUNS> HERE ME NOW BELIEVE ME LATER> DON<T BE GULLIABLE ! Its "are" right, protected by law to own any weapon we choose! AND don,t forget gurella warfare is very effective for underdogs. MAN YA NEED TO RETHINK YOUR POSITION. MAKES ME FEEL GOOD KNOWING THAT A FEW AR_50,s are around. All the owners are sane, justifable, good people. THINK MAN THINK. Okay I read the rest of the thread to here and beyond. my post stands, looks like some of my ideas were running on the same tracks as other great minds.

[Al Lewis]

Okay, here's a cool toy! Be the first on your block to get one.