Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants > Giant Scale Planes > Airframes and Kits
Forgot your password? Create a new account


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2009, 06:05 AM   #1
fonzegator
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 543
Default airframe choice

Hi guys i wanna get a new airframe... but im stuck between the aeroworks 100cc edge540, extreme flight 110" yak or the xtreme composite edge 540...

i will be flying pretty hard so i would really appreciate any input or suggestions... thank u
__________________
The FonZ
Plan the work and Work the plan
fonzegator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 07:57 AM   #2
reyn3545
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
reyn3545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Age: 52
Posts: 5,485
Default Re: airframe choice

I had the Xtreme Composites 100cc 540... nice looking plane, but a lot of rudder-aileron and rudder-elevator coupling. It's fast, very long glide path, and it does fly slow very well, but coupling is an issue in anything but regular forward flight. They don't sell them in the USA anymore, but there are a lot of people still flying them. Once you get the coupling mixed out, it's not a bad plane.

In comparison to the CompARF, the XF a distant second place. Some of the finishing details that CompARF takes, (like installing the canopy mounting tabs, drilling the holes in the stab and tube and mounting the blind nuts in the stab tube, etc.. are not done by XF.

As for the other planes you mentioned... I do like the Aeroworks line. I've owned 3 or 4, each has been very fun to fly. They aren't the lightest planes on the planet, but they are good quality, straight flying planes. Rocco (owner) is very helpful and if there's a problem, they always do the right thing. Several IMAC pilots fly Aeroworks.

ExtremeFlight is headquartered about 4 miles from my house... a great owner (Chris) who is very active in the hobby, and he builds very light, good flying planes. I would say that you'd be happier with one of his planes if you're at the "experienced" level... there's always a trade-off between light and sturdy, and his would be on the "light" end of the curve. So, if you're comfortable with getting a plane up and down (sounds like you are), and you're looking for a good 3D or IMAC plane (his planes have won several in both classes).. you might take a long look at ExtremeFlight.

In general, if you're looking for a plane with less mixing required... go with a Yak over an Edge. The Yaks have a mid-wing design, so there's about the same weight/airfoil above and below the wing. Rudder design is pretty critical on a Yak, and ExtremeFlight does a great job of balancing the amount of rudder resistance above and below the thrust line.

OK Everyone... tell me how wrong I am.....

Last edited by reyn3545; 07-19-2009 at 08:03 AM.
reyn3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 07:57 AM   #3
STLAV8R
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
STLAV8R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 4,050
Default Re: airframe choice

Extreme Flight 110" Yak, hands down!
__________________
STLAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 01:18 AM   #4
fonzegator
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 543
Default Re: airframe choice

ok..... i guess BVM is out.... well i been watchng some build threads here on the aeroworks planes and there are some guys that come in weighing 28#-29# with a 3W in it... im using a 3w 106 and i think 28# is good on a plane with a 3w in it....but i also like the EF yak....but the prob with singapore is that we do not have nicely trimmed grass lands to fly or black tops to land.... i am comfortable bringing a plane up and down... just worriedon how lightly built yhe landing gear on the EF yak is....
__________________
The FonZ
Plan the work and Work the plan
fonzegator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 06:17 AM   #5
fonzegator
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 543
Default Re: airframe choice

Hi Guys... i have decided to go with the Pilot RC YAK 54... beautiful looking plane and i like the colour scheme... also the construction looks great!

here is a link....http://www.pilot-rc.com/ProductShow.aspx?id=62
__________________
The FonZ
Plan the work and Work the plan
fonzegator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 09:37 PM   #6
greg e
Team No Flow Research
 
greg e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 917
Default Re: airframe choice

You will be very happy with your choice. I have the same plane with the DLE-111 and cans from Tony and it was a great deal. It flys like it's on rails with very little mixing. I can't wait to see you maiden it. Good luck.
greg e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:12 AM   #7
fonzegator
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 543
Default Re: airframe choice

Thank u Greg... may i know wat your plane comes in weighing at and your setup is?
__________________
The FonZ
Plan the work and Work the plan
fonzegator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:26 AM   #8
greg e
Team No Flow Research
 
greg e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 917
Default Re: airframe choice

Fonzegator I am thinking about 26 to 27 I have not put it on the scales yet but it fly's light. I let Sensei fly it and he said it fly's like his 40% . I have pulled the throttle back to idle and full up elevator and it did not rock just harriered rock solid. I am using 1 8711 on the rudder pull pull and 1 8711 on each aileron and elevator and have not any problems with blow back or fade of the controls. The most part that I like about it with the cans it is not loud at all very quiet. if you get it with the DLE-111 cet the cans too you will be very happy you did.
greg e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 02:19 AM   #9
danielph
Fly Extreme!
 
danielph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: High Prairie, Washington
Posts: 3,259
Default Re: airframe choice

EF Yak 54 all the way! ! !
__________________
Daniel Holman - Team Horizon Hobby - Team Extreme Flight RC - Fromeco Scale Avionics - Vess Propellers - B&E Graphics - DW Foamies

May God bless you all!
danielph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 03:23 AM   #10
bodywerks
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
Default Re: airframe choice

Of the choices the ef 110 is your only option, imo, because the AW Edge isn't available yet and the Extreme Edge is junk.
And the EF110 Yak looks and flies awesome so you can't go wrong with it.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners
bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 08:18 AM   #11
fonzegator
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 543
Default Re: airframe choice

well.. i already purchased the Pilot RC Yak 54... and froom videos i seen... it flies great... i also agree the EF yak is great... but...i will try this one first.... i like the colour scheme.... plus the hinging is already done... I HATE HINGING!....:P
__________________
The FonZ
Plan the work and Work the plan
fonzegator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 08:20 AM   #12
fonzegator
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 543
Default Re: airframe choice

Quote: Originally Posted by greg e
View Post
Fonzegator I am thinking about 26 to 27 I have not put it on the scales yet but it fly's light. I let Sensei fly it and he said it fly's like his 40% . I have pulled the throttle back to idle and full up elevator and it did not rock just harriered rock solid. I am using 1 8711 on the rudder pull pull and 1 8711 on each aileron and elevator and have not any problems with blow back or fade of the controls. The most part that I like about it with the cans it is not loud at all very quiet. if you get it with the DLE-111 cet the cans too you will be very happy you did.

Hi greg,
yeah im goin with 01 8711 on the rudder too... well im not getting a DLE111... i already have a 3W 106 and i dunt see the need for 2 100cc class engines...plus... i like the sound of a 3W better... i just hope it dont come out @ 31# like my previous plane
__________________
The FonZ
Plan the work and Work the plan
fonzegator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 08:56 AM   #13
gapple12
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
gapple12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San antonio, tx
Age: 33
Posts: 3,236
Default Re: airframe choice

Tony's planes come light. Just go with the lighter equipment and you wont have a problem. Greg did one servo per wing which will also drop half a pound when you add it all up. Good luck, keep us posted. Do you know the weight of your 3W?

Drew
gapple12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 09:33 AM   #14
crazyjoe
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
crazyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: co
Age: 51
Posts: 799
Default Re: airframe choice

Quote: Originally Posted by fonzegator
View Post
Hi greg,
yeah im goin with 01 8711 on the rudder too... well im not getting a DLE111... i already have a 3W 106 and i dunt see the need for 2 100cc class engines...plus... i like the sound of a 3W better... i just hope it dont come out @ 31# like my previous plane
Good engine choice. You get what you pay for. Dont worry about the weight. I built a katana standard build 27.5 lbs. Hovers at 1/3 stick here at 7000 ft elevation. I dont agree with the one servo on these big ailerons for longevity. But many have done it with success.
crazyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 09:51 AM   #15
gapple12
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
gapple12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San antonio, tx
Age: 33
Posts: 3,236
Default Re: airframe choice

Well, I have yet to fly a 35% with one servo per wing, but these servos these days have plenty of torque. I have not heard of any issues doing this, but what I did on mine is remove the old servo bays and place one in the middle since mine is uncovered. Hope if works out for me, have yet to fly it.

Another way to remove weight on these planes is the motor box hardware. They include a metal L bracket for each side and many nuts and bolts to attach it. I would toss it. I simply put 3/4 inch triangle hard balsa in all areas and the strength is incredible. Check out my build thread for the pics. Hope this helps. There are many ways to lighten these planes even more if weight is an issues, but I imagine you will be fine either way.

Drew

http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/f...ilot-diet.html
gapple12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your choice for new airframe robertp17 What's Hot 34 06-26-2009 09:47 AM
Need a new 50cc Airframe.....Help Please T-Time Airframes and Kits 30 06-02-2009 09:37 AM
Sub 16 pound IMAC capable 50cc Airframe blackbeer Airframes and Kits 33 02-19-2009 05:16 PM
Requesting advice on airframe choice jpiii General Discussion 9 12-30-2008 09:59 PM
new airframe cbass Nitro Power 3 09-15-2008 02:24 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.

All Flyinggiants.com content copyright 2006-2012 by RCGroups.com, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The Flyinggiants.com logo is a trademark of RCGroups.com, LLC.
Please report any misuse of our trademarks or copyright violations using the contact form.
RCGroups Network :: RCGroups :: The E Zone :: Lift Zone :: RC Power :: Crackroll :: RC Cars

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.