|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one? | |||
| Hangar 9 35% 260 |
|
7 | 53.85% |
| Thunder Tiger 40% 260 |
|
6 | 46.15% |
| Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 218
|
I need some help making up my mind here. I want to buy a new plane this winter. I've narrowed it down to two options. TTOC 40% 260 or a Hangar 9 35% 260. For either one I will have to buy an engine/prop/exaust, but i have all the servos to out fit the H9, and only a few short of the TOC. I've never owned a 40% but have flown a few i have felt the difference. However my 35% planes are nice to fly as well (and i hear great things on the H9). So the big question do you think it is worth it to spend the extra cash on the 40%? Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Team OMP Pilot
![]() |
Personally for IMAC I prefer a 40%. I use to prefer it for freestyle, but after flying a 32%er for free I am enjoying it more. You just got to remember the bigger they are the more there is to carry at the field. I wouldnt say the more that could go wrong, because you can set up a 40% with about the same set up as a 35%. If you have the money go 40%, but the cost difference is a lot!
Good Luck!
__________________
Kevin Garland TeamOMP Pilot www.ohiomodelplanes.com Fisher Fuel Products www.fisherfuelproducts.com Smart-Fly www.smart-fly.com Spotonrc www.spotonrcusa.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Walla Walla Wa
Posts: 1,162
|
The TTOC 240 is a nice flying plane,, I would buy the TT over the hangar 9 in either size as if you strip off the covering you will find the TT is a better built plane..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: High Desert California, USA
Age: 50
Posts: 5,686
|
ACE/TT
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Your my boy Blue!!!1
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 4,208
|
The H9 extra is an awesome plane but a 40%er is a 40%er...
__________________
Thanx to The Crew Mike B. Jim Z. Ed J. Jim S. Airman Wheels www.jerseymodeler.com lazertoyz.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
WHATS CRACKALAKIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wentzville, MO
Age: 35
Posts: 9,297
|
Both of those planes fly extremely well......I think it really comes down to the $$
__________________
Cracky get the good stuff: 3D HOBBY SHOP~FROMECO~SMART-FLY Check my For Sale items HERE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Your my boy Blue!!!1
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 4,208
|
Yep
__________________
Thanx to The Crew Mike B. Jim Z. Ed J. Jim S. Airman Wheels www.jerseymodeler.com lazertoyz.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
GRAVITY SUCKS
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 4,281
|
if it were me i would go with the hangar 9 you can get parts at a reasonable price. and you cant get that with ace tt... ask me how i know???
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a new 50cc Airframe.....Help Please | T-Time | Airframes and Kits | 30 | 06-02-2009 09:37 AM |
| Sub 16 pound IMAC capable 50cc Airframe | blackbeer | Airframes and Kits | 33 | 02-19-2009 05:16 PM |
| LOOKING FOR A 210 airframe | BillJ | General Discussion | 12 | 10-14-2008 02:20 AM |
| new airframe | cbass | Nitro Power | 3 | 09-15-2008 02:24 AM |