|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Windsor
Posts: 13
|
I am just finishing up a Carden Cuda. Currently locating the fuel dot and vent etc. Planning a two line system. The vent is easy enough to route out the bottom aft of the gear. Finding a location for the fuel dot is a bit more of a challenge.
Should the fuel dot be located higher than the tank to prevent fuel from syphoning out right after fueling? Or can it go lower than the tank. There is not much room on the fuselage above the wing so the options seem to be below or possibly up on the turtle deck aft of the cockpit. It would fit nicely on the motor box bottom but access may be a bit dificult (cowl is quite open down there) and it is well below the tank at that point. Any comments and advice appreciated. pjp01 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,968
|
I put together a Yak last fall and only had one spot to put the fuel dot and it happened to be level with the bottom of the tank. Did not think anything of it, except when I fueled the tank for the first time. As soon as you pull your filler out the gas starts siphon out so you have to pinch the fuel line and put the dot back in. If you are one that does not empty your tank every day you could put a check valve in-line and problem solved. I have too many planes (yea right!) and feel better emptying them every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Weber, Utah
Age: 54
Posts: 1,333
|
Fuel syphoning can definitely be an issue with gasoline. I wonder if you could use one of those one-way valves made for smoke systems? That would keep you from pumping out the tank, but there is little reason to do that anyway with gasoline. I think its actually better to leave some gas in the tank; keeps the pickup line soft.
__________________
“Aircraft are a lesson in economics . . .” – Don Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States, IN, Fort Wayne
Age: 54
Posts: 2,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
..
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 40
Posts: 3,349
|
Try to mount the fueler as high as you can preferably above the tank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Holliston, MA
Posts: 850
|
Or even just leave enough slack in the fill line so that you can lift it about the top of the tank when disconnecting the fill line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Windsor
Posts: 13
|
Thanks for the replies. The hemostats are a good option. I am leaning towards sticking it aft on the turtle deck. Thunderbolt R/C has a red anodized dot that would not be too unatractive. Way above the tank back there. Clearly siphoning has to be delt with one way or another.
pjp01 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Obsessed
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 6,669
|
That's a good work-around but as soon as you accidently drop the fuel line, it spills gas. I always locate it above the tank. Not much above the tank, just at the top level where the vent is. I agree that there are not many places to mount it that high. You also don't want the switch under it....so you don't get gas on it.
In this pic you can see the fuel dot is below the switch but both are above the thrust line. The dot is right at the top of the tank....not above it.
__________________
Videos: 88" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynkFiYZOS7k 88" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1SD21qAJoA 110" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/user/Vortran?.../5/UyaC9xGFKTk Last edited by JoeAirPort; 01-28-2011 at 10:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
..
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 40
Posts: 3,349
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Obsessed
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 6,669
|
__________________
Videos: 88" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynkFiYZOS7k 88" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1SD21qAJoA 110" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/user/Vortran?.../5/UyaC9xGFKTk |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#11 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Windsor
Posts: 13
|
Thats great, thanks for the picture. Nice vids in your signature. Hopefully this plane flys just a fraction as well as that. First large scale and 3d plane for me. Fun to build.
Jason |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Gettin' Lower!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
|
Any reason you chose not to go with a three line system? They're just easier and better imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Weber, Utah
Age: 54
Posts: 1,333
|
As for fuel dot and switch placement, I usually put them on opposite sides of the plane. That way you can put the fuel dot as high as possible without the switch getting in the way or getting contaminated.
+1 on the three line system. Also consider this, eliminating the T fitting from the engine feed line increases reliabilty in several ways. If the fuel dot plug falls off inflight on a three line system, its a non-issue.
__________________
“Aircraft are a lesson in economics . . .” – Don Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Obsessed
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 6,669
|
__________________
Videos: 88" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynkFiYZOS7k 88" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1SD21qAJoA 110" EF Yak http://www.youtube.com/user/Vortran?.../5/UyaC9xGFKTk |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#15 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Windsor
Posts: 13
|
Only planning a two line for weight savings. Seemed like a fairly common setup.
Haven''t ruled out a three line system. It does seem a bit more bullet proof to me. Thanks for the comments Jason |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|