|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Use Std Ultracote or Ultracote Parklite for 2X4 Glider? | |||
| Use std Ultracote for the added durability. |
|
1 | 50.00% |
| Use Ultracote Parklite for light weight & best performance. |
|
1 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Who's Up 4 Strokin' It?
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States, NY, Brasher Falls-Winthrop
Age: 62
Posts: 88
|
I'm building a small sailplane for my grandaughter.
49 1/2" wingspan, probably 4 channels (rudder, elevator & 2 channels for aileron diff) W/Hitec 05S micro RX & HS-55 servos. I am going to use 1 micro servo in each wingtip for aileron differential & whatever size Nmh battery pack in the nose that will balance it out. I am considering using Ultracote Parklite for covering to keep weight down. It's spec'ed @ 28oz W/1983 era radio equipment (2 servos). The author quoted 10oz for his radio equipment. Is the weight savings of the Ultracoat Parklite worth the diminished durability? A roll of standard Ultarcote wieghs about 3.6oz while the roll of Parklite weighs about .5 oz. Since I will use almost all of the roll on the plane, I can save nearly 3oz AUW by using the Parklite. I figure that I can save about 8oz total W/the lighter batteries/radio equipment & covering.
__________________
Saito FA91S CDI, Saito FA150 CDI, Saito FA180 CDI, Saito FA180HC CDI Saito FA300TTDP CDI, Saito 200Ti (soon to be CDI) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Thermal Hunter
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States, NY, New York
Posts: 163
|
The weight of the roll is only useful if they are exactly the same size rolls and have the same weight tube inside.
The weight savings are probably not worth the difference in durability. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It's Sooo Fluffy!!
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western, pa, usa
Posts: 2,977
|
Info gathereed from HH website: http://www.horizonhobby.com/products...red-HANU866#t1 http://www.horizonhobby.com/products...e-red-HANU0815 True red standard ultracoat = 0.30 oz/sq.ft. True red parklite ultracoat = 1.07 oz/sq. YD (this equates to .119 oz/sq.ft.) Based on using the whole roll, no waste (78"x23" or 12.458 sq. ft.) toal weights would be.. standard: 3.737 oz of material parklite: 1.483 oz of material savings would be 2.254 oz per roll IMO since you are using standard equipment and it is for a child, I would use standard ultracoat for durability. That being said the thickness of the materials are different however I could not find data on standard ultracoat. standard: Not listed? parklite: 13 microns thickness
__________________
KUSTOM AERO DESIGNS http://kustomaerodesign.weebly.com/index.html Laser Cutting & Engraving Services From Prototype to Production |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 Tequila Cup (Full Scale IAC) | Bill_Higgins | Full Scale Huckin' | 4 | 11-10-2006 09:25 AM |
| DA 100 Airframe needed!! | airborneSGT | Airframes and Kits | 3 | 06-18-2006 04:13 PM |