Ultimate Biplane 33% ( 100cc ) from world models

[Billa]

QQ stands for Quique Somenzini - one of the best fliers on the aeromodelling scene and he has setup a company which offers his designs for various power plants - the 102" YAK 54 for 100cc engines being the rage these days.

[Hector]

Here is a Pic of the QQ Yak (Mine) so you have an Idea of what the airplne looks like. BTW is my best flying airplane.

[bmeulti]

I Wonder where you assembeled your plane SMOKEY ?

[Vic3D]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Hector
	Here is a Pic of the QQ Yak (Mine) so you have an Idea of what the airplne looks like. BTW is my best flying airplane.

That is the ONLY airplane you have.

[hady]

yeh i know Quique Somenzini not personaly but i know his baground he is great but didnt know that he was called QQ

[hady]

my best design and depending on the review i have read EDGE is on of the best 3d airplane

[Mithrandir]

3D 100cc size plane.... I think everyone who has flown the QQ yak... call it "The Best"....

You will not be disappointed with this plane!!

[Hector]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Mithrandir
	3D 100cc size plane.... I think everyone who has flown the QQ yak... call it "The Best".... You will not be disappointed with this plane!!

From the one's that I have flown and own I agree 100% with you!!!

Hey Vic What ment to say is, that is the best plane that I have ever own, so cut the wise crap!!! Chill Kid, OK!!

[Vic3D]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Hector
	From the one's that I have flown and own I agree 100% with you!!!

Then you need to fly my 260. Just kidding.

[SMOKEY]

	Quote: Originally Posted by bmeulti
	I Wonder where you assembeled your plane SMOKEY ?

In some cockroach infested dungeon that doesn't even have a fridge

Smokey

[Ronbo]

The story i have from a WM sponsored pilot is a bit different on
WM vs Aeroworks and the . He has both 33 and 42% to build. Ill see if i cant persuade him to check them out. Hes had some major job priorities in the last year or more.
Aeroworks quality has known to fall behind the last few years. several threads or posts on RCuniverse discuss it. only recently with new planes have they regained their name, IIRC.
For me, Im happy with my H9 Ultimate...

[bmeulti]

Your just jealous of my shop.you cant even drill a prop right with out me

bmeulti

[SMOKEY]

	Quote: Originally Posted by bmeulti
	Your just jealous of my shop.you cant even drill a prop right with out me bmeulti

It was the defective drill press you made me use.

Smokey

[Mithrandir]

	Quote: Originally Posted by Ronbo
	The story i have from a WM sponsored pilot is a bit different on WM vs Aeroworks and the . He has both 33 and 42% to build. Ill see if i cant persuade him to check them out. Hes had some major job priorities in the last year or more. Aeroworks quality has known to fall behind the last few years. several threads or posts on RCuniverse discuss it. only recently with new planes have they regained their name, IIRC. For me, Im happy with my H9 Ultimate...

Regardless... the quality of the kit is basically OK.... old school construction... they fly really good.... but the fit'n'finish is junk... clearly substandard compared to QQ's, Hyde Models, TOC1-AM-AbM, Wild Hare, Airwild... well... Everyone else...
And AW has clearly stepped up the quality of what they distribute... so either way... it was good for AW

(Don't get me wrong... I get nothing from AW or WM... But I have seen the AW QB's and they are nice.. ALL the WM's have been kinda junky at the detail level.. Like they carried the ball to the 90 yard line and fumbled!!! )

[hugo111]

I might be mistaken but there is a long thread on a 27% Ultimate from World Models, and I believe it is the same plane as the 33%...... if it isn't its very close the dimensions are very similar....

I've just got mine yesterday and I'm wondering if my Saito 300TDP (50cc) will be ok. I just posted there asking that question.