Mike-

In the description, it's always called Hangar 9 Sukhoi SU-26MM I've heard of a SU-26M...

Are those your intitals?

Doug

Mike, the showtime in your avitar, is that going to be an available color?

SU-26MM. Yes the MM are my initials.

No, the Mini ST in the avitar was just a photoshop joke someone in the office did.

Originally Posted by mmcconville

I have a feeling you will...

Are you saying that Brendan needs one of these for freestyle ?

Originally Posted by mmcconville

SU-26MM. Yes the MM are my initials.

No, the Mini ST in the avitar was just a photoshop joke someone in the office did.

To bad, the orange, red and black look good together. I didn't notice the Harley logo at first.

I would like to see a different style of lettering on the plane. It just does not look right to me.

Originally Posted by Rolling Thunder

To bad, the orange, red and black look good together. I didn't notice the Harley logo at first.

Mike,

This one is for you, Stremba Built Carden CUDA - Harley

Ward

Here are some shots I took at the iHobby expo in Chicago today. The thing looks awesome!

Doug

kinda plain on the bottom....but that is good as it leaves the creativeness to the customer

But I'm sure it flies well. H9 has some good designs and craftsmanship on their planes

Oh yea, I forgot. It doesn't come with any Red Bull text or logos like the full-scale Matadors...

Doug

Any ideas as to the Airwild SU and some of the others on the market. Any oneBetter than the other?

Originally Posted by mmcconville

Hi Guys


The intent of this model is to make a Sukhoi fly extremely well. Lets be honest, there are NO Suk models in existance (till now) that dont have coupeling issues among other things. Some fly good, but none excellent. None well enough to compete in IMAC at the top levels..

Excuse me?

I take exception to this broad generalization.

The 35% Wild Hare Sukhoi is an excellent flying plane, which has just about the exact same layout as the H9 but is bigger. I made all the same mods the Mike made, with the exception of not leaving the h-stab looking like a Yak. It's lowered from stock location, but not quite as much.

Our plane has won several IMAC events this year. It is set up not only for "A" canister but also for dual canisters if the owner wants to use a twin. Our pocket hinges are unique and make trimming much easier.

The DA-85 is completely adequate for the Wild Hare Sukhoi and is overkill on the H9 plane. There is no need to settle for a smaller plane, and the Wild Hare price includes CF wing and stab tubes and instrument panel.

Ask anyone who owns one if they like the way it flies.

TF

Originally Posted by wildhare

Excuse me?

I take exception to this broad generalization.

The 35% Wild Hare Sukhoi is an excellent flying plane, which has just about the exact same layout as the H9 but is bigger. I made all the same mods the Mike made, with the exception of not leaving the h-stab looking like a Yak. It's lowered from stock location, but not quite as much.

Our plane has won several IMAC events this year. It is set up not only for "A" canister but also for dual canisters if the owner wants to use a twin. Our pocket hinges are unique and make trimming much easier.

The DA-85 is completely adequate for the Wild Hare Sukhoi and is overkill on the H9 plane. There is no need to settle for a smaller plane, and the Wild Hare price includes CF wing and stab tubes and instrument panel.

Ask anyone who owns one if they like the way it flies.

TF

You have your own threads about your plane... This is about H9's. That is just wrong!!

No, it is not wrong! Mike brought up the "fact" that there was no other Sukoi that flies as good. Tom just responded to that statement.
Bob

Well In Tom's defense here , it looks like the WH Sukhoi got over looked i think. That WH Suk has done more than prove it'self in competition this year. I think MM built a great plane for sure , he just made it sound like since H9 didn't produce it , it didn't exist. I think Tom has every right to step in and defend his creation............wouldn't you? I hope this thread doesn't become a bash thread , and each person can make up his own mind on what plane they want to fly......no need to bash or even "overlook" another company's airplane. I believe your "wrong" by not thinking Tom shouldn't defend his airplane a little............sheeesh!